Showing posts with label history. Show all posts
Showing posts with label history. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 10, 2012

A forgotten False-Flag Operation in the US

(Note: All links from Wikipedia article preserved below.)

Operation Northwoods


Operation Northwoods was a series of false-flag proposals that originated in 1962 within the United States government, and which the Kennedy administration rejected. [2] The proposals called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), or other operatives, to commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro.[3] One part of Operation Northwoods was to "develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington."
Operation Northwoods proposals included hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. It stated:
"The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere."
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/b/b1/NorthwoodsMemorandum.jpg
Several other proposals were included within Operation Northwoods, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government's Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted; it was authored by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, but then rejected by President John F. Kennedy.

None of the Operations Northwoods proposals became operational.

Contents (links to original Wikipedia Article)


Origins and public release

The main proposal was presented in a document entitled "Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)", a top secret collection of draft memoranda written by the Department of Defense (DoD) and the Joint Chiefs of Staff (JCS).[1] The document was presented by the Joint Chiefs of Staff to Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on 13 March 1962 as a preliminary submission for planning purposes. The Joint Chiefs of Staff recommended that both the covert and overt aspects of any such operation be assigned to them.
The previously secret document was originally made public on 18 November 1997, by the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Review Board,[4] a U.S. federal agency overseeing the release of government records related to John F. Kennedy's assassination.[5][6][7][8] A total 1521 pages of once-secret military records covering 1962 to 1964 were concomitantly declassified by said Review Board.
"Appendix to Enclosure A" and "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" of the Northwoods document were first published online by the National Security Archive on 6 November 1998 in a joint venture with CNN as part of CNN's 1998 Cold War television documentary series[9][10]—specifically, as a documentation supplement to "Episode 10: Cuba," which aired on 29 November 1998.[11][12] "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the document which contains the proposals to stage terrorist attacks.
The Northwoods document was published online in a more complete form (i.e., including cover memoranda) by the National Security Archive on 30 April 2001.[13]

Content

In response to a request for pretexts for military intervention by the Chief of Operations of the Cuba Project, Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the document listed methods, and outlined plans, that the authors believed would garner public and international support for U.S. military intervention in Cuba. According to Jacob Hornberger:
“ The plan called for U.S. personnel to disguise themselves as agents of the Cuban government and to engage in terrorist attacks on the U.S. base at Guantanamo Bay. It also called for terrorist attacks within the United States that would be conducted by pro-U.S. forces disguising themselves as Cuban agents. One of the most fascinating aspects of Operation Northwoods involved the proposed hijacking of an American passenger plane. The JCS proposed that a real plane containing American passengers would be hijacked by friendly forces disguised as Cuban agents. The plane would drop down off the radar screen and be replaced by a pilotless aircraft, which would crash, purportedly killing all the passengers. Under the plan, the real passenger plane would be secretly flown back to the United States.[14]
”
More specifically, the plan called for the following:
  1. Since it would seem desirable to use legitimate provocation as the basis for US military intervention in Cuba a cover and deception plan, to include requisite preliminary actions such as has been developed in response to Task 33 c, could be executed as an initial effort to provoke Cuban reactions. Harassment plus deceptive actions to convince the Cubans of imminent invasion would be emphasized. Our military posture throughout execution of the plan will allow a rapid change from exercise to intervention if Cuban response justifies.
  2. A series of well coordinated incidents will be planned to take place in and around Guantanamo to give genuine appearance of being done by hostile Cuban forces.
    a. Incidents to establish a credible attack (not in chronological order):
    1. Start rumors (many). Use clandestine radio.
    2. Land friendly Cubans in uniform "over-the-fence" to stage attack on base.
    3. Capture Cuban (friendly) saboteurs inside the base.
    4. Start riots near the base main gate (friendly Cubans).[15]
    5. Blow up ammunition inside the base; start fires.
    6. Burn aircraft on air base (sabotage).
    7. Lob mortar shells from outside of base into base. Some damage to installations.
    8. Capture assault teams approaching from the sea or vicinity of Guantanamo City.
    9. Capture militia group which storms the base.
    10. Sabotage ship in harbor; large fires—napthalene.
    11. Sink ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims (may be in lieu of (10)).
    b. United States would respond by executing offensive operations to secure water and power supplies, destroying artillery and mortar emplacements which threaten the base.
    c. Commence large scale United States military operations.
  3. A "Remember the Maine" incident could be arranged in several forms:
    a. We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.
    b. We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to "evacuate" remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation.
  4. We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.[16]
    The terror campaign could be pointed at refugees seeking haven in the United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans en route to Florida (real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement, also would be helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.
  5. A "Cuban-based, Castro-supported" filibuster could be simulated against a neighboring Caribbean nation (in the vein of the 14 June invasion of the Dominican Republic). We know that Castro is backing subversive efforts clandestinely against Haiti, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, and Nicaragua at present and possible others. These efforts can be magnified and additional ones contrived for exposure. For example, advantage can be taken of the sensitivity of the Dominican Air Force to intrusions within their national air space. "Cuban" B-26 or C-46 type aircraft could make cane-burning raids at night. Soviet Bloc incendiaries could be found. This could be coupled with "Cuban" messages to the Communist underground in the Dominican Republic and "Cuban" shipments of arm which would be found, or intercepted, on the beach.
  6. Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk inherent in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of the MIG could be produced from US resources in about three months.[17]
  7. Hijacking attempts against civil air and surface craft should appear to continue as harassing measures condoned by the government of Cuba. Concurrently, genuine defections of Cuban civil and military air and surface craft should be encouraged.
  8. It is possible to create an incident which will demonstrate convincingly that a Cuban aircraft has attacked and shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba. The passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering a non-scheduled flight.
    a. An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be converted to a drone.
    b. Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba the drone will begin transmitting on the international distress frequency a "MAY DAY" message stating he is under attack by Cuban MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow ICAO radio[18] stations in the Western Hemisphere to tell the US what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to "sell" the incident.
  9. It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over international waters in an unprovoked attack.
    a. Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft will be dispatched in trail from Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations of these flights at frequent Intervals. Crews would be briefed to remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions were taken by the Cuban MIGs.
    b. On one such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island this pilot would broadcast that he had been jumped by MIGs and was going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people, quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and aircraft would then have disappeared.
    c. At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down, a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts, parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast and depart. The pilots returning to Homestead would have a true story as far as they knew. Search ships and aircraft could be dispatched and parts of aircraft found.[19]
James Bamford wrote on Northwoods:
“ Operation Northwoods, which had the written approval of the Chairman and every member of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, called for innocent people to be shot on American streets; for boats carrying refugees fleeing Cuba to be sunk on the high seas; for a wave of violent terrorism to be launched in Washington, D.C., Miami, and elsewhere. People would be framed for bombings they did not commit; planes would be hijacked. Using phony evidence, all of it would be blamed on Castro, thus giving Lemnitzer and his cabal the excuse, as well as the public and international backing, they needed to launch their war.[20] ”

Related Operation Mongoose proposals

In addition to Operation Northwoods, under the Operation Mongoose program the U.S. Department of Defense had a number of similar proposals to be taken against the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro.
Twelve of these proposals come from a 2 February 1962 memorandum entitled "Possible Actions to Provoke, Harass or Disrupt Cuba," written by Brig. Gen. William H. Craig and submitted to Brig. Gen. Edward Lansdale, the commander of the Operation Mongoose project.[7][8]
The memorandum outlines Operation Bingo, a plan to; "create an incident which has the appearance of an attack on U.S. facilities (GMO) in Cuba, thus providing an excuse for use of U.S. military might to overthrow the current government of Cuba."
It also includes Operation Dirty Trick, a plot to blame Castro if the 1962 Mercury manned space flight carrying John Glenn crashed, saying: "The objective is to provide irrevocable proof that, should the MERCURY manned orbit flight fail, the fault lies with the Communists et al. Cuba [sic]." It continues, "This to be accomplished by manufacturing various pieces of evidence which would prove electronic interference on the part of the Cubans."
Even after General Lemnitzer lost his job as the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Joint Chiefs of Staff still planned false-flag[dubious ] pretext operations at least into 1963. A different U.S. Department of Defense policy paper created in 1963 discussed a plan to make it appear that Cuba had attacked a member of the Organization of American States (OAS) so that the United States could retaliate. The U.S. Department of Defense document says of one of the scenarios, "A contrived 'Cuban' attack on an OAS member could be set up, and the attacked state could be urged to take measures of self-defense and request assistance from the U.S. and OAS."
The plan expressed confidence that by this action, "the U.S. could almost certainly obtain the necessary two-thirds support among OAS members for collective action against Cuba."[20][21]
Included in the nations the Joint Chiefs suggested as targets for covert attacks were Jamaica and Trinidad-Tobago. Since both were members of the British Commonwealth, the Joint Chiefs hoped that by secretly attacking them and then falsely blaming Cuba, the United States could incite the people of the United Kingdom into supporting a war against Castro.[20] As the U.S. Department of Defense report noted:
Any of the contrived situations described above are inherently, extremely risky in our democratic system in which security can be maintained, after the fact, with very great difficulty. If the decision should be made to set up a contrived situation it should be one in which participation by U.S. personnel is limited only to the most highly trusted covert personnel. This suggests the infeasibility of the use of military units for any aspect of the contrived situation."[20]
The U.S. Department of Defense report even suggested covertly paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United States: "The only area remaining for consideration then would be to bribe one of Castro's subordinate commanders to initiate an attack on [the U.S. Navy base at] Guantanamo."[20]

Reaction

The continuing push against the Cuban government by internal elements of the U.S. military and intelligence communities (the failed Bay of Pigs Invasion, the Cuban Project, etc.) had already prompted President John F. Kennedy to attempt to rein in burgeoning hardline anti-Communist sentiment that was intent on proactive, aggressive action against communist movements around the globe. After the Bay of Pigs, Kennedy had fired CIA director Allen W. Dulles, Deputy Director Charles P. Cabell, and Deputy Director Richard Bissell, and turned his attention towards Vietnam. Kennedy had also stripped the CIA of responsibility for paramilitary operations like the Bay of Pigs and turned them over to the U.S. Department of Defense and the Joint Chiefs of Staff, which, as Commander in Chief, Kennedy could more directly control. Personally, Kennedy expressed outrage to many of his associates about the CIA's growing influence on civilians and government inside America, and his attempt to curtail the CIA's extensive Cold War and paramilitary operations was a direct expression of this concern.
Kennedy personally rejected the Northwoods proposal, and it would now be the Joint Chiefs' turn to incur his displeasure. A JCS/Pentagon document (Ed Lansdale memo) dated 16 March 1962 titled MEETING WITH THE PRESIDENT, 16 MARCH 1962 reads: "General Lemnitzer commented that the military had contingency plans for US intervention. Also it had plans for creating plausible pretexts to use force, with the pretext either attacks on US aircraft or a Cuban action in Latin America for which we could retaliate. The President said bluntly that we were not discussing the use of military force, that General Lemnitzer might find the U.S so engaged in Berlin or elsewhere that he couldn't use the contemplated 4 divisions in Cuba."[22] The proposal was sent for approval to the Secretary of Defense, Robert McNamara, but was not implemented.
Following presentation of the Northwoods plan, Kennedy removed Lemnitzer as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, although he became Supreme Allied Commander of NATO in January 1963. American armed forces leaders began to perceive Kennedy as going soft on Cuba, and the President became increasingly unpopular with the military, a rift that came to a head during Kennedy's disagreements with the service chiefs over the Cuban Missile Crisis.
On 3 August 2001, the National Assembly of People's Power of Cuba (the main legislative body of the Republic of Cuba) issued a statement referring to Operation Northwoods and Operation Mongoose wherein it condemned such U.S. government plans.[23]

See also

Further reading

  • Jon Elliston, editor, Psywar on Cuba: The Declassified History of U.S. Anti-Castro Propaganda (Melbourne, Australia and New York: Ocean Press, 1999), ISBN 1-876175-09-5.
  • James Bamford, Body of Secrets: Anatomy of the Ultra-Secret National Security Agency From the Cold War Through the Dawn of a New Century (New York: Doubleday, first edition, 24 April 2001), ISBN 0-385-49907-8. Here is an excerpt from Chapter 4: "Fists" of this book.

References

  1. ^ a b U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, "Justification for US Military Intervention in Cuba (TS)", U.S. Department of Defense, 13 March 1962. The Operation Northwoods document in PDF format on the website of the independent, non-governmental research institute the National Security Archive at the George Washington University Gelman Library, Washington, D.C. Direct PDF links: here and here.
  2. ^ Ruppe, David (May 1, 2001). "U.S. Military Wanted to Provoke War With Cuba". ABC News. Retrieved January 21, 2012.
  3. ^ Zaitchik, Alexander (3 March 2011) Meet Alex Jones, Rolling Stone
  4. ^ "The Records of the Assassination Records Review Board," National Archives and Records Administration.
  5. ^ "Media Advisory: National Archives Releases Additional Materials Reviewed by the Assassination Records Review Board," Assassination Records Review Board (a division of the U.S. National Archives and Records Administration), 17 November 1997. A U.S. government press-release announcing the declassification of some 1500 pages of U.S. government documents from 1962–64 relating to U.S. policy towards Cuba, among which declassified documents included the Operation Northwoods document.
  6. ^ Jim Wolf, "Pentagon Planned 1960s Cuban 'Terror Campaign'," Reuters, 18 November 1997.
  7. ^ a b Mike Feinsilber, "At a tense time, plots abounded to humiliate Castro," Associated Press (AP), 18 November 1997; also available here.
  8. ^ a b Tim Weiner, "Documents Show Pentagon's Anti-Castro Plots During Kennedy Years," New York Times, 19 November 1997; appeared on the same date and by the same author in the New York Times itself as "Declassified Papers Show Anti-Castro Ideas Proposed to Kennedy," late edition—final, section A, pg. 25, column 1.
  9. ^ "National Security Archive: COLD WAR: Documents," National Security Archive, 27 September 1998 – 24 January 1999.
  10. ^ U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff, "Appendix to Enclosure A: Memorandum for Chief of Operations, Cuba Project" and "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify US Military Intervention in Cuba," U.S. Department of Defense, circa March 1962. First published online by the National Security Archive on 6 November 1998, as part of CNN's Cold War documentary series. "Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A" is the section of the Operation Northwoods document which contains the proposals to stage terrorist attacks.
  11. ^ "Episode 10: Cuba; Cuba: 1959–1968," CNN (Cable News Network LP, LLLP).
  12. ^ "Cold War Teacher Materials: Episodes," and "Educator Guide to CNN's COLD WAR Episode 10: Cuba," Turner Learning (Turner Broadcasting System, Inc.).
  13. ^ "Pentagon Proposed Pretexts for Cuba Invasion in 1962," National Security Archive, 30 April 2001.
  14. ^ Hornberger, Jacob (2011-02-24) Don't Northwoods Iran, Future of Freedom Foundation
  15. ^ Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify US Military Intervention in Cuba, p7, media.nara.gov, accessed 3 September 2009
  16. ^ Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify US Military Intervention in Cuba, p8, media.nara.gov, accessed 3 September 2009
  17. ^ Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify US Military Intervention in Cuba, p9, media.nara.gov, accessed 3 September 2009
  18. ^ Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify US Military Intervention in Cuba, p10, media.nara.gov, accessed 3 September 2009
  19. ^ Annex to Appendix to Enclosure A: Pretexts to Justify US Military Intervention in Cuba, p11, media.nara.gov, accessed 3 September 2009
  20. ^ a b c d e Bamford , James (2002). Body of secrets: anatomy of the ultra-secret National Security Agency. Random House. p. 82. ISBN 978-0-385-49908-8.
  21. ^ Mike Feinsilber, "Records Show Plan To Provoke Castro," Associated Press (AP), 29 January 1998.
  22. ^ Lansdale Memo of 16 Mar 1962. This memo records a high-level meeting in the White House 3 days after McNamara was presented with Operation Northwoods. [1]
  23. ^ "Statement by the National Assembly of People's Power of the Republic of Cuba," National Assembly of People's Power of Cuba, 3 August 2001; also available here.

External links

See the above "References" section for documents cited in the body of this article.

Monday, May 14, 2012

US Military taught to use ‘Hiroshima’ Tactics for ‘Total War’ on Islam

Source: http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/05/total-war-islam/

U.S. Military Taught Officers: Use ‘Hiroshima’ Tactics for ‘Total War’ on Islam



dooley_presentation_slide1

Lt. Col. Matthew A. Dooley's Joint Staff Forces College presentation on "A Counter-Jihad Op Design Model" (.pdf) calls for violent measures in a war against Islam. (emphasis added) 
 
The U.S. military taught its future leaders that a “total war” against the world’s 1.4 billion Muslims would be necessary to protect America from Islamic terrorists, according to documents obtained by Danger Room. Among the options considered for that conflict: using the lessons of “Hiroshima” to wipe out whole cities at once, targeting the “civilian population wherever necessary.”
The course, first reported by Danger Room last month and held at the Defense Department’s Joint Forces Staff College, has since been canceled by the Pentagon brass. It’s only now, however, that the details of the class have come to light. Danger Room received hundreds of pages of course material and reference documents from a source familiar with the contents of the class.

The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff recently ordered the entire U.S. military to scour its training material to make sure it doesn’t contain similarly hateful material, a process that is still ongoing. But the officer who delivered the lectures, Army Lt. Col. Matthew A. Dooley, still maintains his position at the Norfolk, Virginia college, pending an investigation. The commanders, lieutenant colonels, captains and colonels who sat in Dooley’s classroom, listening to the inflammatory material week after week, have now moved into higher-level assignments throughout the U.S. military.
For the better part of the last decade, a small cabal of self-anointed counterterrorism experts has been working its way through the U.S. military, intelligence and law enforcement communities, trying to convince whoever it could that America’s real terrorist enemy wasn’t al-Qaida — but the Islamic faith itself. In his course, Dooley brought in these anti-Muslim demagogues as guest lecturers. And he took their argument to its final, ugly conclusion.

“We have now come to understand that there is no such thing as ‘moderate Islam,’” Dooley noted in a July 2011 presentation (.pdf), which concluded with a suggested manifesto to America’s enemies. “It is therefore time for the United States to make our true intentions clear. This barbaric ideology will no longer be tolerated. Islam must change or we will facilitate its self-destruction.”
Dooley could not be reached for comment. Joint Forces Staff College spokesman Steven Williams declined to discuss Dooley’s presentation or his status at the school. But when asked if Dooley was responsible for the course material, he responded, “I don’t know if I would classify him [Dooley] as responsible. That would be the commandant” of the school, Maj. Gen. Joseph Ward.
That makes the two-star general culpable for rather shocking material. In the same presentation, Dooley lays out a possible four-phase war plan to carry out a forced transformation of the Islam religion. Phase three includes possible outcomes like “Islam reduced to a cult status” and “Saudi Arabia threatened with starvation.” (It’s an especially ironic suggestion, in light of today’s news that Saudi intelligence broke up the most recent al-Qaida bombing plot.)

International laws protecting civilians in wartime are “no longer relevant,” Dooley continues. And that opens the possibility of applying “the historical precedents of Dresden, Tokyo, Hiroshima, Nagasaki” to Islam’s holiest cities, and bringing about “Mecca and Medina['s] destruction.”
 

Dooley’s ideological allies have repeatedly stated that “mainstream” Muslims are dangerous, because they’re “violent” by nature. Yet only a few of al-Qaida’s most twisted fanatics were ever caught musing about wiping out entire cities.
“Some of these actions offered for consideration here will not be seen as ‘political correct’ in the eyes of many,” Dooley adds. “Ultimately, we can do very little in the West to decide this matter, short of waging total war.”

Dooley, who has worked at the Joint Forces Staff College since August 2010, began his eight-week class with a straightforward, two-part history of Islam. It was delivered by David Fatua, a former West Point history professor. “Unfortunately, if we left it at that, you wouldn’t have the proper balance of points of view, nor would you have an accurate view of how Islam defines itself,” Dooley told his students. Over the next few weeks, he invited in a trio of guest lecturers famous for their incendiary views of Islam.

Shireen Burki declared during the 2008 election that “Obama is bin Laden’s dream candidate.” In her Joint Forces Staff College lecture, she told students that “Islam is an Imperialist/Conquering Religion.” (.pdf)

Stephen Coughlin claimed in his 2007 master’s thesis that then-president George W. Bush’s declaration of friendship with the vast majority of the world’s Muslims had “a chilling effect on those tasked to define the enemy’s doctrine.” (.pdf)  Coughlin was subsequently let go from his consulting position to the military’s Joint Staff, but he continued to lecture at the Naval War College and at the FBI’s Washington Field Office. In his talk to Dooley’s class (.pdf), Coughlin suggested that al-Qaida helped drive the overthrow of Egyptian strongman Hosni Mubarak and Libyan dictator Muammar Gadhafi. It was part of a scheme by Islamists to conquer the world, he added. And Coughlin mocked those who didn’t see this plot as clearly as he did, accusing them of “complexification.”

Coughlin titled his talk: “Imposing Islamic Law – or – These Aren’t the Droids Your Looking For!”
Former FBI employee John Guandolo told the conspiratorial World Net Daily website last year that Obama was only the latest president to fall under the influence of Islamic extremists. “The level of penetration in the last three administrations is deep,” Guandolo alleged. In his reference material for the Joint Forces Staff College class, Guandolo not only spoke of today’s Muslims as enemies of the West. He even justified the Crusades, writing that they “were initiated after hundreds of years of Muslim incursion into Western lands.”

Guandolo’s paper, titled “Usual Responses from the Enemy When Presented With the Truth” (.pdf), was one of hundreds of presentations, documents, videos and web links electronically distributed to the Joint Forces Staff College students. Included in that trove: a paper alleging that “it is a permanent command in Islam for Muslims to hate and despise Jews and Christians” (.pdf). So was a video lecture from Serge Trifkovic, a former professor who appeared as a defense witness in several trials of Bosnian Serb leaders convicted of war crimes, including the genocide of Muslims. A web link, titled “Watch Before This Is Pulled,” supposedly shows President Obama — the commander-in-chief of the senior officers attending the course — admitting that he’s a Muslim.

Dooley added the caveats that his views are “not the Official Policy of the United States Government” and are intended “to generate dynamic discussion and thought.” But he taught his fellow military officers that Obama’s alleged admission could well make the commander in chief some sort of traitor. “By conservative estimates,” 10 percent of the world’s Muslims, “a staggering 140 million people … hate everything you stand for and will never coexist with you, unless you submit” to Islam. He added, “Your oath as a professional soldier forces you to pick a side here.” It is unclear if Dooley’s “total war” on Muslims also applied to his “Muslim” commander in chief.
After the Pentagon brass learned of Dooley’s presentation, the country’s top military officer, Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Gen. Martin Dempsey, issued an order to every military chief and senior commander to get rid of any similar anti-Islam instructional material. Dempsey issued the order because the White House had already instructed the entire security apparatus of the federal government — military and civilian — to revamp its counterterrorism training after learning of FBI material that demonized Islam.

By then, Dooley had already presented his apocalyptic vision for a global religious war. Flynn has ordered a senior officer, Army Maj. Gen. Frederick Rudesheim, to investigate how precisely Dooley managed to get away with that extended presentation in an official Defense Department-sanctioned course. The results of that review are due May 24.

Ironically, Dooley and his guest lecturers paint a dire picture of the forward march of Islamic extremism right as its foremost practitioner feared its implosion. Documents recently declassified by the U.S. government revealed Osama bin Laden fretting about al-Qaida’s brutal methods and damaged brand alienating the vast majority of Muslims from choosing to wage holy war. Little could he have known that U.S. military officers were thinking of ways to ignite one.
 
See Also:

Friday, January 20, 2012

The Satanic Versus Unexpurgated

The Satanic Versus Unexpurgated by Sheikh Ahmed Deedat

 

STRICT NOTE: The following book is a response to The Satanic Verses which is one of the worst literature that you can possible choose to read or research. I recommend that you choose a better topic than The Satanic Verses but if you would like to know what Salman Rushdie actually wrote, feel free to read the following book. However, passages from Rushdie’s book are quoted, the language is not appropriate and it’s best if you avoid reading it. I have not read the following in its entirety but I share it only to give a befitting response to people who claim superiority of free speech. InshAllah!

THE PEN AND THE SWORD
So far ‘Satanic’ Salman has succeeded in causing the death of 40 Muslim men, widowed Muslim women and orphaned Muslim children with his poisoned pen, proving the old saying (if proof was needed) that “The Pen is Mightier than the Sword!”
Despite all my anger, sorrow and bitterness I still lead with my fellow Muslims in travail – “Stop crying “don’t wail! No more protest marches or book burning!” All our visible signs of pain and anguish are giving the enemies of Islam gleeful sadistic pleasures. I say, STOP IT! Turn the Tables.

TURNING THE TABLES
Let us learn a lesson from the life of Jesus Christ (peace be upon him). His detractors came to him again and again with posers and riddles as recorded in the Christian New Testament. His own people, the Jews, came to him, with mockery on their lips and mischief in their hearts, saying “Master, we caught this woman in the act of adultery, what must we do to her? Jesus turned the tables on the Jews. Again, on another occasion, they said, Master, must we pay tribute (taxes) to Caesar or not? Once more again Jesus turned the tables on the Jews in the Temple of Solomon on his triumphant march onto Jerusalem with his disciples, he physically overturned the money changers’ tables and with a corded whip, whipped them out of the Temple.
We shamefully acknowledge that we lack the potency to whip anybody, but every Muslim who reads these words and understands what he is reading can turn the tables on every Westerner who defends Rushdie.

UNEXPURGATED RUSHDIE
There is no way of cleaning the stable without dirtying your hands. I have seen numerous TV programs debating Rushdie’s ‘Satanic Verses.’ But not one, I repeat again NOT ONE Muslim defender of our Cause grappled with the nettle. One who came nearest was one of our intellectuals who when prodded as to what in Rushdie’s book created such terrible umbrage in the Muslim minds, in Rushdie’s work? He timidly quoted the word “bhaen-chud” from Satanic Salman’s – “The Satanic Verses.”

What did this word “bhaenchud” mean to some 50 million American viewers on ABC or was it PBS TV network ? Absolutely NOTHING!

“Bhaenchud” is only for starters. You have been warned. This publication, the word “UNEXPURGATED” which means that Rushdie’s text in his original “The Satanic Verses” are not tampered with. That nothing is done by me to remove, expunge, erase any obscene or pornographic word or phrase. If you can’t stomach Rushdie’s “shit”* in print. Please tear up this publication and throw it in your toilet pan. In all my lectures on Rushdie, I had warned my audiences in advance that my talks were “Definitely not for Prudes, children, and Bashful Men and Women!

From now on, you can look forward to sharing the “gems” (the shit which Rushdie has excreted) with your Western friends and neighbours. Create opportunities to expound “The Satanic Verses”

—————————————————————-
*. This is a very mild expression from Rushdie’s Book. See and hear me on Video “IS JESUS GOD?” a debate with Dr. Shorrosh in which I was hard put skirting round and round this word and yet never corning to uttering it: in deference to my audience.
—————————————————————

A NOVEL APPROACH
Begin like this-”Admitted that Rusdie has many filthy, dirty, and obscene things to say about Islam and its heroes and heroines: but sir, do you know what he has to say about you, his benefactors and protectors, what thanks he gives you for his up-bringing, cultural and moral deportment, and un-solicited refuge and hospitality?”
On the very first(@)page of “The Satanic Verses,” Rushdie calls his god fathers the British “PROPER LONDON, BHAI!(#) HERE WE COME! THOSE BASTARDS DOWN THERE WON’T KNOW WHAT HIT THEM.”
Bastards! He could have said those sons of bitches. But wait, let Rushdie get warmed up.
The first time I ever uttered the word “bastard” was in the early sixties at a public meeting in the City Hall of Durban, at question time, I happened to quote a verse from the Holy Bible to illustrate a point; I had read:
“The bastard shall not enter the congregation of the Lord; even unto the tenth generation…? Deuteronomy 23:2
—————————————————————-

(@) The actual first page of Chapter One is numbered 3. Because this Satan has counted Nos. 1 and 2 without enumerating them. ie. No. 1 is a dedication to his living companion in ‘Hell’ (of his own making) with just 2 words FOR MARRLANE” his second spouse, on the whole page and No.2 is a prologue on “SATAN” by Daniel Dcfoc from his book “The History of the Devil,” which astonishinglyenough is Rushdie himself. (Read the reproduction in the book), you can’t help agreeing, how “prophetic” are those words!

(#) “BHAI” What is “bhai”? Satanic Salman has used a dozen exotic Hindi words on the first page alone in his the very first chapter, gleaned from the gutters of Bombay. But wait for what he spews out from the sewers of his birth place. He scatters his obscenities a hundred names without translating them to tantalize his Western dimwits.
—————————————————————-

This one word – bastard, nearly brought the roof down on me! How could Deedat utter such a word? Remember, I was only quoting!

My audience did not know that this Anglo-Saxon unsavory word bastard was repeated in the “Book of Books” only three times, in nearly 1500 pages. Rushdie does it 29 times in his bid to beat all records for all times in his tome of 500, double spaced, sparsely typed pages. Observe this evil genius constructing a one letter sentence out of it.

“THAT, AND ALSO HER, THE ICEWOMAN. BASTARD. (note: this b-a-s-t-a-r-d is a sentence by itself) NOW THAT I AM DEAD I HAVE FORGOTTEN HOW TO FORGIVE.” Page 8 of the Devil’s “The Satanic Verses,” in short TSV in all future references.

This Devil incarnate has learnt from his British peers the art of staccato sentences. Now watch him do the impossible with words.

He can introduce THREE “Bastards” in a single short sentence
….”THAT BASTARD, THOSE BASTARDS, THEIR LACK OF BASTARD(*) TASTE.” (page 137 TSV)

Salman Rushdie holding a copy of his book The Satanic Verses

WHAT A PRIZE!
Could Viking/Penguin the publishers of this filth have given Rushdie eight hundred thousand dollars ($800 000) as advance money for this? Not likely! They have good (?) business sense. They smelt their “PIECE OF PIG EXCREMENT” (Rushdie’s words page 7 TSV) “ROTTEN COCKROACH DUNG” (page 13 TSV Not smelly enough? Rushdie excretes his shit quite late in his book, in his own words – “THE SHIT STARTS” (page 434 TSV). Please check up! “THIS SHIT, YOU CUNTS,” “IT’S SHIT,” “IT’S FUCKING SHIT,” “SHIT DINNER,” Four “shits” on one page alone 441 TSV, Page 449 “THREW SHIT.” Page 461 “WHITE MAN’S SHIT,” there must be something special in it for this Brown Britisher, because he says – “BLACK SHIT IS BAD,” on page 529 of his bullshit book the TSV.
—————————————————————-
(*) Rushdie’s own emphasis
—————————————————————-

PROLOGUE
Satan, being thus confined to a vagabond, wandering, unsettled condition, is without any certain abode; for though he has, in consequence of his angelic nature, a kind of empire in the liquid waste or air, yet this is certainly part of his punishment, that he is . . . without any fixed place, or space, allowed him to rest the sole of his foot upon. Daniel Defoe, The History of the Devil
All this shit of Rushdie will not satiate Peter Mayer the Director of Penguin and his fellow gluttons. They need something more sticky and stinky to satisfy their depraved tastes. And, Rushdie is their man of the hour. There will never be another to get away with the lampooning of Hindus, Muslims, Christians and Jews. Blacks as well as all Whites! Not even sparing the “Iron Lady,” nor the Queen of Great Britain. If you, the reader have come thus far, you might as well go the whole hog. Finish this book!

SELECTIVE SENSITIVITY
Everyone in the West, British and American, giants of the literary world, are not impervious to sacrilege, insults and profanities as contained in “The Satanic Verses.” Roald Dahl, a British author and member of the Literary Guild had some pertinent remarks as reproduced here from “The Daily News” dated March 1st, 1989.

THE DAILY NEWS WEDNESDAY, MARCH 1,1989
Rushdie
LONDON: Author Roald Dahl has launched an extraordinary attack on fellow writer Salman Rushdie, calling him a “dangerous opportunist”.
In a letter to yesterday’s Times newspaper, the world renowned author of children’s books said: ‘Clearly he has profound knowledge of the Muslim religion and its people, and he must have been totally aware of the deep and violent feelings his book would stir up among devout Muslims “in other words he knew exactly what he was doing and he cannot plead otherwise.”
Dahl said this type of sensationalism did get “indifferent” hooks to the top of the best-seller list “but to my mind it is a cheap way of doing it.
“To my mind, he is a dangerous opportunist.” He later told reporters:
“I think he’s a twit.”

Cynical supporters of Rushdie’s rights of freedom of speech and expression might say that for Dahl it was a question of “sour grapes.” Not having been nominated on the shorter list of the prestigious “Booker Award,” himself.

CHRISTIAN AND JEW UNITE!
What would they then say of the Archbishop of Canterbury Dr Robert Runcie who has said in the first official statement by the Church of England -”ONLY THE UTTERLY INSENSITIVE CAN FAIL TO SEE THAT THE PUBLICATION OF SALMAN RUSHDIE’S BOOK HAS DEEPLY OFFENDED MUSLIMS BOTH HERE AND THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.” The Anglican Primate continued: “I UNDERSTAND THEIR FEELINGS AND I FIRMLY BELIEVE THAT OFFENCE TO RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OF THE FOLLOWERS OF ISLAM OR ANY OTHER FAITH IS QUITE AS WRONG AN OFFENCE AS TO THE RELIGIOUS BELIEFS OF CHRISTIANS.”

And what have the dullards on the Rushdie bandwagon to say of the Chief Rabbi of Britain Lord Jakobovits who was the first religious leader in Britain to “DEPRECATE….THE OFFENCE CAUSED” by the book, has reiterated his view that it “SHOULD NOT HAVE BEEN PUBLISHED.” In a letter to The Times (4th March 1989) the Chief Rabbi also agreed on the need to “PROHIBITING THE PUBLICATION OF ANYTHING LIKELY TO INFLAME, THROUGH OBSCENE DEFAMATION…”

What motives can we attribute to the three above? Nothing other than the Love of God and the Love of Man based on Eternal Truths.
The Holy Quran describes these godly men as – “And among them (the Jews and Christians) are Mu’mins, (meaning Faithful, Sincere People)…”Holy Quran 3:110

But lest we are deluded into complacency, the All-Wise Merciful God reminds us in the concluding phrase of the above verse – “But the majority of them are perverted transgressors.”

How amply are the words proven true, again and again! Are these atheistic and materialistic so called Jews and Christians beyond redemption? No! We are never to despair! There is still much good in them. Learn to talk to them rationally, not emotionally. Give them living examples from their daily lives in their day to day affairs.

MPs ANGERED
Date lined from London, on the 22nd May,1989, was a roaring headline in “The Daily News.”

CALL FOR BAN
LONDON: Furious British MPs have called for American actor Mickey Rourke to be banned from Britain. Harry Greenway, Conservative MP for Ealing North, said: “I hope the British Government will never allow this man to set foot on our shores.I am shocked beyond belief.” The MPs were particularly incensed by his use of a four-letter word to describe Mrs Margaret Thatcher’s policies.
Foreign service.

I sympathize with the British in their righteous indignation. Though the English speaking people, both British and American bandy around not only four-letter words, but five and seven letter profane words in their normal cultural and social relationships. Yet they are highly sensitive when the same words are used in connection with their own heroes and heroines.

DOUBLE STANDARDS
What grates me most is the rank hypocrisy of the one thousand and one Poets, Playwrights and Pimps; Editors, Essayists and Eunuchs;
Novelists, Newspapermen and Non-Conformists who signed and paid for adverts in the National Newspapers in support of Rushdie’s right to absolute freedom of speech and expression. Yet not a single one of those thousand will raise an eyebrow in defending Rourke’s right to use just a four-letter word even once. Not against Mrs. Thatcher in person but against her economic Policies. Their hypocrisy is unbearable!

What was that “four-letter” word which roused such fury and ire among a people reputed for their calm, placid, sagacity? It is downright silly to beat around the bush. That emotive word is F-U-C-K! Because of this single four- letter word, Lady Chatterly’s Lover was banned in South Africa for twenty years! Even the dullest of the English speaking people conjure up the word fuck, when the expression “four-letter” is used.

A TETRAGRAMATTON
The Jehovah’s Witnesses, a very active and most militant evangelistic Christian sect, never use the expression “four-letter word” in any of their literature though a four letter word is the king-pin of their preaching.($) They have invented a fourteen letter word to describe a four-letter word. Imagine!
They ever and anon substitute -”TETRAGRAMATTON” instead of simply the word “four” Rushdie has overcome this typical British aversion by making a “four-letter” word into a seven letter word by simply adding the present participle suffix to the word FUCK by adding I-N-G, making it FUCKING. See how adroitly he made the whole British nation swallow the word FUCKING while Rourke’s “FUCK,” was getting stuck in their throats.
—————————————————————-
($). Obtain your FREE copy of the book – “What is his name?” from the Center for fuller explanation.
—————————————————————-

“OH. SHE’S (Maggie) RADICAL ALL RIGHT. WHAT SHE (Maggie) WANTS-WHAT SHE (Maggie) ACTUALLY THINKS SHE (Maggie) CAN FUCKING ACHIEVE (%) IS LITERALLY… FROM FUCKING SURREY AND HAMPSHIRE… NOBODY’S EVER TRIED TO REPLACE A WHOLE FUCKING CLASS BEFORE…
THIS COUNTRY THAT’S STUFFED FULL OF FUCKING OLD CORPSES.
(Rushdie’s “The Satanic Verses” page 270).

It is strange that the British can stomach four “fuckings” in one paragraph from Rushdie but one “fuck” from Rourke infuriates them. Is it because Rushdie is their brother-in- law and son-in-law combined. (Remember! His divorced 1st wife was British) A cursory count will give you 5 FUCKS and 52 FUCKINGS in this what the Western world has called a literary masterpiece! Don’t forget, only 52, just one “FUCKING” for every week of the year!
One can’t help agreeing that “The Satanic Verses” is a masterpiece for fucking-up the English language. He has conjoined his word “FUCKING” with every letter of the alphabet. Here is a quick summary of some of them. Verify the rest at leisure.

A “FUCKING A.”……..245
..”FUCKING ALLIES”….269
..”FUCKING AMERICANS”.280
..”FUCKING ARGENTINA”.268
B “FUCKING BEATLES”…163
..”FUCKING BEDPAN”….169
C “FUCKING CLASS”…..270
..”FUCKING CREEP”…..178
..”FUCKING CLOWNS”….101
..”FUCKING COMMANDOS”..80
D “FUCKING DIFF?”…..262
..”FUCKING DYNASTY”…265
..”FUCKING DOGS”……410
..”FUCKING DREAMS”….122
E “ENJOY FUCKING”…..149
G “FUCKING GUITAR”….269
H “FUCKING HORNY”…..158
..”FUCKING HELLHC)LE”.180
I “FUCKING IDIOT”…..526
please forgive me, if it is getting too boring. Here is a little variation
FUCKING TANK……………\
FUCKING PEE AITCH DEE..\
FUCKING COUNTRY………..\ All this from a
FUCKING LIFE………………../ single page 268 TSV
FUCKING NATION…………./
THE BASTARDS……………./
Why you enjoy fucking with this one. p.149
You are fucking my woman p.207
Don’t holy men ever fuck? p.278
God’s own permission to fuck p.386

I have had enough of this “fucking shit” (words borrowed from Satanic Salman) let me end with a last bit “WILD DONKEYS FUCKING WEARILY AND DROPPING DEAD STILL CONJOINED” (page 479 TSV)

Dear reader, if any pervert, dolt or dullard protests that the foregoing quotations are out of context, then obtain the text (Satanic Salman’s Satanic Verses).If you already have it then please buy three high-lighters- red, yellow and green, and go to town in colour coding Rushdie’s shit. RED for all the “fuck” and “fucking” words. YELLOW for all the Hindi exotic words, like “bhaenchud”, “yaar,” “haramzada,” etc. And GREEN for quotable verses I’ll refer you to them later.

Thus armed with a colour-coded “The Satanic Verses,” you can plaster the cynics and mockers of Muslims with Rushdie’s excrement. They ought to relish it, never mind how much they protest. It’s food for the maggots! Like randy hooker – Pamella Bordes; Mother India also gave birth to Salman Rushdie, alias Satanic Salman, also “Saladin Chamcha” or “Spoono” and “Gibreel Farishta” all are one and the same-Rushie of “The Satanic Verses” fame. Nurtured in the Western culture, both Pamella and Salman spurned their faiths. At the tender age of thirteen, Rushdie was thrown into the laps of the West. He studied at Rugby and Cambridge in England and imbibed its culture. He went the whole hog. Listen to his philosophy. page 211 TSV ie. “The Satanic Verses”. He wrote-

“BUT TO BE RAISED IN THE HOUSE OF POWER IS TO LEARN ITS WAYS, TO SOAK THEM UP, THROUGH THAT VERY SKIN THAT IS THE CAUSE OF YOUR OPPRESSION. THE HABIT OF POWER, ITS TIMBRE, ITS POSTURE, ITS WAY OF BEING WITH OTHER. IT IS A DISEASE, BILAL, INFECTING ALL WHO COME TOO NEAR IT. IF THE POWERFUL TRAMPLE OVER YOU, YOU ARE INFECTED BY THE SOLES OF THEIR FEET.” TSV p.211

It is worth highlighting the above quotation in GREEN. Rushdie is giving here the source of his own inspiration and nourishment. He has imbibed the worst of both worlds! Now see, how he repays his British god-fathers for all their kind and generous hospitality.

He charges his British benefactors as an incestuous people. He calls them “THE SISTER FUCKING BRITISH.” (%) TSV p.80. This is the unkindest cut of them all. He marries Pamela Lovelace according to his story in the TSV. And according to his own philosophy she was destined “FOR FUCKING AND THROWING OVER,”($) which he did by, divorcing her.

Where did he get the information from that the British fuck their own sisters. Perhaps his Pamela may have confided in him, and maybe he betrayed her trust.

(%) All emphasis in this quote, are Rushdie’s own!

THE IRON LADY
My wife has a special liking for Mrs. Margaret Thatcher. She cannot explain. She does not understand her politics. Perhaps it is the clarity of her voice and forceful speeches that attract her to the “Iron Lady”.
Islam forbids the giving of offensive nick-names to anybody . I take it that Iron Lady is not offensive. If it is, my apologies. I owe Mrs. Thatcher nothing. But my wife and I were offended on learning that beside disparaging her successful economic policies with obscenities, (Refer earlier pages ). Now he makes his character to say – “‘I’M TALKING- ABOUT YOU-KNOW-WHO,’ VALANCE EXPLAINED HELPFULLY. ‘TORTURE. MAGGIE THE BITCH.” TSV p.269.

Mickey Rourke (p.8) used only a four letter word for Mrs. Thatcher’s POLICIES and Britain was incensed, but when Rushdie applies a five letter title (B-I-T-C-H), it become Kosher(@) Halaal, Permissable! Strange. Oh British, how did Rushdie bewitch you with b-i-t-c-h?

—————————————————————-
(%) All emphasis in this quote, are Rushdie’s own!
($) For futher explanation on this phrase see the section under “All ‘white’ women!” title
(@) Kosher: The Jewish term for what they consider to be Halaal or permissible
—————————————————————-

IS TSV A NOVEL?
Rushdie claims that his TSV is only a novel, it is fiction, it is a dream within a dream. Don’t you remember that every movie before its screening, at one time, displayed a notice to wit – “All characters in this film are fictitious and the similarity of any name to persons living or dead are merely coincidental.” Tell that to Mark Thatcher or Carol Thatcher, Mrs. Thatcher’s son and daughter and see what they do to you! Nobody will blame them for any grievous bodily harm. Try! Try!

In the house of Islam, anyone traducing the fair name of any lady, living or dead, will be required to produce four “EYE WITNESSES” to the alleged indiscretion to qualify as a “bitch,” and if under cross-examination one of them fails, all the four witnesses will receive 80 lashes each. Cruel! Barbaric! You say. You would not say that if your mother’s integrity was involved. I bet! If Rushdie himself was an eye witness to his wife’s adultery, he may divorce her on that ground but he would not be allowed to have her arrayed before an Islamic Court without three other impeccable eye witnesses to corroborate his charge, failing which he too will receive eighty lashes.

NEW MEANING
The Western world has developed an art of glamorizing filth and sin. IMMORALITY is now termed “new morality!” A BASTARD is now called a “love-child!” and a BITCH which normally meant a female dog; when applied to a woman it implied that she was like the bitch in season (rut) – given up to uninhibited sexual abandon, free to all comers. This word is derogatory no more if you apply a superlative to it i.e. simply add the adjective “super” make it “SUPERBITCH!”

SUPER BITCH
It is defamatory and libelous to call a woman a bitch, but not if you call her a “super bitch.”
My country South Africa is an industrial giant. It produces 50% of the total electricity of the African continent. 60% of Africa’s total industrial output. It is like a part of the United States in Africa. At the moment it is out to outshine Hollywood. She is on the verge of completing a soap opera for TV called “WHIRLPOOL” to compete with Dynasty and Dallas and later export it to America. Our leading lady for Whirlpool is Jana Cilliers our own. She is being advertised as “SUPERBITCH” “The Daily News” dated March 17, 1989.
Would the British people be happier if another upstart changed Rushdie’s “MAGGIE THE BITCH” to “Maggie the Superbitch!”??

THE QUEEN NOT SPARED
I was born British. I still cherish a British passport over 60 years old. I don’t know what’s its worth. English has become my mother tongue. I dream in English and I also swear in English. I have visited Britain a dozen times. More than once I was tempted to visit the Speakers Corner, Hyde Park, London, enjoying the many passionate and vehement harangues. It’s free for all. One is allowed to curse, abuse and swear anybody and everybody. The law of libel and defamation does not apply in this haven of free speech and un-bridled expressions. Yet I am told that Her Majesty the Queen of England is above any abuse or tirade. She is sacrosanct! Not only in Hyde Park but throughout Britain either by word of mouth or through the media, “Thou shalt not denigrate the queen”.

A retired employee at Buckingham Palace wrote a book entitled “Officially Speaking.” About the goings on in the Royal precincts. About drunken orgies and sexual frolics among the Royalty. The publication of this piece of Royal gossip has rightly been suppressed by Mrs. Thatcher’s government.
Amazing England! Rushdie prevails where a blue blooded Englishman fails. Thanks to Maggie and her British votaries of free speech.

ONLY DREAMING SEX WITH QUEEN
“Chamcha (another name of Rushdie in the TSV) he found himself dreaming of the Queen. of MAKING TENDER LOVE to the MONARCH. She was the body of Britain, the avatar of the State, and he had chosen her, JOINED WITH HER; she was his Beloved, the moon of his delight” (page 169 of TSV)(1) . What is Rushdie telling his readers, if not that he fucked her Majesty. “Joined with her,” above compare with his expression “STILL CONJOINED,” on page 12.
I expect some British blockhead of the literary world to cry – “Oh! Rushdie only fucked our Queen in his dream.” It is all fiction! After all, we can’t hold a man accountable for his dreams. That is true, but “O pervert!” Rushdie was not dreaming when he penned those words!
—————————————————————-
(1). Mark this quotation with a green marker and memorize it.
—————————————————————-

ALL ”WHITE” WOMEN!
Lest the commoner say that “Rushdie only lampoons the high and mighty like the Prime Minister of Britain – Maggie and the Monarch of Britain – The Queen!” Let me remind them that he has not forgotten you the plebeian – the ordinary Whites in the country. Nay, he honours all whites, wheresoever they abide.

This choicest piece of racism should also be highlighted with a glowing green pen and memorized.

“WHITE WOMEN – NEVER MIND FAT, JEWISH, NON-DEFERENTIALLY WHITE WOMEN – WERE FOR FUCKING AND THROWING OVER.” (Page 261 TSV)
In Rushdie’s perverted mind, the fate of every “white women” was for fucking and throwing over. The only qualification required by Rushdie is that they be “WHITE” It does not matter their Shape or size. Whether with a hooked Jewish nose or an Anglo-Saxon angular nose. Whether you can recognize their nationality or not. Whether they be English, or Irish; Scottish or Welsh; German or French;

American or Canadian – provided they are white! “THEY ARE ONLY GOOD FOR DISCARDING AFTER FUCKING” Says Rushdie!

PUBLIC READING OF TSV
The Satanic Verses were being read in Britain and America. One Susan Sontag of the Literary Guild among others read this religious regularity in New York to her doting audiences, both, black and white, young and old.
Some Afro-American (^) youths imbibed the message. “WHITE WOMEN ARE FOR FUCKING AND THROWING OVER!” For after all, what is reading if not brain-washing. We are what we eat and we are what we read!
Dr. Vernon Jones, an American psychologist of great repute carried out experiments on groups of school children to whom certain stories were being read, and at the end of his experiments he concluded – “That these stories made certain slight but permanent changes in character, even in the narrow class-room situation.”
—————————————————————-
(^) Rushdie call them “Niggers”! see page 461 TSV “Nigger eat white man’s shit.” And on page 449 “Niggerjimmy” and “mushroom.”
—————————————————————-

SATANIC INSPIRATION
Susan Sontag, a white woman, relished her reading of “The Satanic Verses.” so did her admirers. One young listener was inspired! He was waiting for an opportunity to put Rushdie’s idea into action.

It didn’t take long. Soon afterwards with five others – the gang of six – one Muslim and five Christians were prowling at night in Central Park, New York, looking for adventure. They saw a “WHITE WOMAN” jogging. She triggered their imagination! They went a “W-I-L-D-I-N-G”(*) as the “Times” magazine, of 8th May, 1989, reports. They bashed the poor woman into unconsciousness, and fell on their prey like a pack of wolves. -

They gang raped her one by one in turn which no wild beast ever does. The blood and the sweat and the gore titillated their libido!
That poor jogger was an innocent victim. It should have been Susan Sontag, or Marriane Wiggins (Rusdie’s 2nd wife) who says that if she was not Rushdie’s wife then she too would have read “The Satanic Verses,” to her clientele, in public from city to city.
—————————————————————-
(^) Rushdie call them “Niggers”! see page 461 TSV “Nigger eat white man’s shit.” And on page 449 “Niggerjimmy” and “mushroom.”
(*) WILDING: A new word meaning, went berserk sexually Like a pack of wolves scenting blood!
—————————————————————-

TSV SHOULD BE READ TO ALL BLACKS!
 
If I was a sadistic racist, I would have liked to have “The best of Rushdie” read in Harlem, New York; and in every ghetto in America and in Notting Hill in the U.K. and among all the blacks of the world, in Africa and in Asia and in Eskimo land. Let the non-Whites of the world know that according to Rushdie’s new Bible – “WHITE WOMEN – NEVERMIND FAT, JEWISH, or NON-DEFERENTIAL WHITE WOMEN – WERE FOR FUCKING AND THROWING OVER”!

You Peter Mayer! Director of Viking/Penguin, you son of a bitch, you gave Rushdie $800, 000-00 Dollars as advance money for this filth.


All those whites – Poets and Playrights, Essaysts and Editors, Novelists and Newsmen who are in support of Rushdie’s smut, let them read the above quotation from the shit of Rushdie to their mothers, to their sisters, to their wives and daughters. Make their mouths water, that Rushdie wants them to be fucked by black people and thrown away. Rushdie has already set the example, he has FUCKED AND THROWN AWAY (one British girl, his 1st wife) and perhaps before you get this into your hands, he would have done the same to another (American girl -Marriane Wiggins) also FUCKED AND THROWN AWAY!




I am asking all those sons-of-bitches who rushed to Rushdie’s support without really reading his TSV, the real reason for their unqualified support. Did they not come across these “tasty eats”?
“MOTHER-FUCKING AMERICANS” TSV p.80
“MOTHER-FUCKING SPARKS” TSV p.85
“MOTHER-FUCKING DREAMS” TSV p.122
“BHAENCHUD(#) NIGHTMARE” TSV p.109
—————————————————————-
(#). Bhanchud: Means “sister-fucking” in the gutter lingo of Bombay. Rushdie wisely questions on page 441 TSV “How are you supposed to understand a man who writes a made-up lingo of his own”?
—————————————————————-

COMPARED WITH WHORES
There is no end to Rushdie’s shit. He has 547 pages full of it. Though he has some brilliant things to say at times. He equates himself, and all the writers, authors, novelists etc. With hookers and harlots, prostitutes and pimps. He makes one of his characters to utter :
“WRITERS AND WHORES. I SEE NO DIFFERENCE HERE.” TSV 392

TRIBUTE TO RAJIV
Before I end this most agonizing little essay, I had ever written. I must thank Rajiv Gandhi for being about the first (?) country in the world to ban “The Satanic Verses.” Stop attributing motives to people! My own country the Republic of South Africa was in the forefront on banning the book, as well as debarring Rushdie from entering the country. This was in early October 1988! Long before many a Muslim nation!

I congratulate the Prime Minister of India for his sagacious move. The devilish book would not only have wounded his Muslim subjects in India but it would have also seared his Hindu co-religionists as well. The devil Rushdie has spared no one.

RAMA REVILED
Nobody has yet drawn the attention of Rushdie’s Hindu admirers as to what he has to say about the gods and goddesses of their faith.
“HERE WAS A LECHEROUS, DRUNKEN RAMA AND A FLIGHTY (@) SITA: WHILE RAVANA, THE DEMON-KING, WAS DEPICTED AS AN UPRIGHT AND HONEST MAN ‘GIBREEL (that’s Rushdie himself again in his TSV) IS PLAYING RAVANA,’ GEORGE EXPLAINED IN FASCINATED HORROR. ‘LOOKS LIKE HE’S TRYING DELIBERATELY TO SET UP A FINAL CONFRONTATION WITH RELIGIOUS SECTARIANS, KNOWING HE CAN’T WIN, THAT HE’LL BE BROKEN TO BITS.”‘ TSV pS39.

Rama the 7th incarnation of god, according to the Hindu religion, venerated and worshipped by hundreds of millions of Hindus in India, is character assassinated as a lecher, one given to excessive sexual cravings and debauchery, and the demon-king is portrayed here as a righteous man. And Sita is painted as a flirt. This is typical of Rushdie. He turns gods into devils and devils into saints! And the Swiney confesses that the likes of him “WILL BE BROKEN TO BITS!” – “GUY SEEMS HELL-BENT ON A SUICIDE COURSE.” TSV page 538. He has uttered here words of wisdom, but alas, he has learnt nothing from them himself.

BEFITTING END
Mired in misery, may all his filthy lucre choke in his throat and may he die a cowards death, a hundred times a day, and eventually when death catches up with him, may he simmer in hell for all eternity!
—————————————————————-
(@) FLIGHTY: Does not mean “full of flight,” as one running away from illicit sexual advances, but as one who is sexually frivolous and irresponsible. Easily excited, easily aroused sexually.
—————————————————————-